For Immediate Release: Thursday 17 November
“Earlier this year, the future of the Department of Liquor Control (DLC), and in particular, efforts to privatize the distribution of alcoholic beverages in Montgomery County arose as an issue in the General Assembly. In my view, these legislative efforts, which were supported by several local chambers of commerce and some licensees, did not garner widespread support nor were they fully analyzed for the potential impact to Montgomery County.
“To more thoroughly address the issue, I proposed a workgroup to explore options for different organizational models for liquor control and distribution that would meet the goals of privatization while maintaining the reliable revenue stream that is generated each year by this taxpayer asset. The Montgomery County Delegation, the Alcoholic Beverages Advisory Board, and the Chambers of Commerce supported that idea.
“As I said on numerous occasions, I am not philosophically opposed to the idea of privatization and was interested in hearing and exploring any and all ideas. My charge to the Workgroup was that it evaluate proposals for privatization against the goals of continuing to build on the improvements being made in providing quality service, excellent product selection and competitive prices, holding the County harmless in terms of existing and future revenue generated by DLC, protecting our bonds currently guaranteed by DLC revenue and protecting our valued County employees.
“The Workgroup included representatives of the manufacturing, wholesale and retail segments of the industry, the Chambers of Commerce, labor, the County Delegation and County Council and Executive Branch. I want to thank the members of the Workgroup for their time and assistance in this endeavor. The Workgroup met over several months, heard from industry representatives and experts, both local and from around the country.
“Additionally, we engaged the services of Public Financial Management (PFM) to analyze the options brought forward, with a primary focus on the fiscal impact of the options and the impact, if any, on the outstanding bonds supported by DLC revenue. PFM was also asked to comment on other impacts such as convenience, customer service and price.
“Those options included full privatization and a variety of partial privatization ideas, private management of DLC, establishment of an independent Liquor Authority, Bailment for the warehouse and use of agency stores to increase the number of spirits outlets. Click here to see the PFM Report.
“Based on the PFM analysis, the privatization option that best meets the goals I laid out is to create a Liquor Control Authority. A Liquor Authority will bring private sector experience and management to the table in the form of a Board of Directors; the organization will be more nimble and adaptive to market changes and community needs, and would improve operational efficiency and effectiveness, while continuing to transfer profits to the County. Therefore, I instructed my staff to draft legislation to accomplish this objective. The full bill will be available on the Montgomery County Delegation website soon.
“The legislation would:
“I also understand that Delegate Charles Barkley, who was a member of the Workgroup intends to introduce legislation to authorize the County to establish Agency stores. I am very interested in this proposal, which could be implemented by the County or the Liquor Control Authority.
“In the meantime, as these proposals are considered and potentially implemented, we firmly maintain our commitment to continue to implement improvements to the operations of the DLC. In addition to hiring new managers from the private sector, in the past year, we have improved:
Contact: Patrick Lacefield 240-777-6528